Nanoball

[Guest Pattanct]

Hi,

anyone use this nanoball which claimed to improved power and fuel saving

any comment?

[Guest blackmercs]

Pattanct wrote:

Hi,

anyone use this nanoball which claimed to improved power and fuel saving

any comment?

Till date there is not such product as improved power and fuel saving. If there is such product exist, the car maker will confirm install it onto their model. I might be wrong though but after tested so many so-called "more power and fuel saving products" during my crazy mod days i have seen none.

[Guest Pattanct]

blackmercs wrote:

Till date there is not such product as improved power and fuel saving. If there is such product exist, the car maker will confirm install it onto their model. I might be wrong though but after tested so many so-called "more power and fuel saving products" during my crazy mod days i have seen none.

well, not totally agreed, due to costs saving, manufacturer will not implement every features into car, if they do, you might not be able to afford, (I mean myself) not to undermind anybody.

some product do works however.

[Guest NewC180]

Most of the time, you can have either improved power, or improved fuel efficiency, you can't have both. If there's such a product, I'm keen too.

Some wise man told me before:

1. Cheap

2. Good

3. Fast

You can only choose 2 from the above, applies to a lot of things....

Cheers!

[Guest ACSLK]

Hard to find fuel saving products if Power is needed...........

need more power is quite natural more fuel is needed.........

cheers

[Guest kepiting1sg]

NewC180 wrote:

Most of the time, you can have either improved power, or improved fuel efficiency, you can't have both. If there's such a product, I'm keen too.

Some wise man told me before:

1. Cheap

2. Good

3. Fast

You can only choose 2 from the above, applies to a lot of things....

Cheers!

Bro Heng,

Sometime can lah but very rare.

"When all things are equal" - when the car is underpower with very "bad" power to weight ratio - an increase in power at such time "save fuel"

In olde days when mata weak kaki shorts for uniform.

One particular car stand out - The Alfa Romeo GT series.

To cater for different market segments -

The same car cums in 1300 & 1600 GT Junior & also 1750 & 2000 GTV.

The 1300 GT Junior was grossly underpowered and consumed more fuel than the nicely weighted 1600GT Junior.

IMHO - Nowadays lots of Snake Oil products in the market! :becky:

[Guest blackmercs]

Pattanct wrote:

well, not totally agreed, due to costs saving, manufacturer will not implement every features into car, if they do, you might not be able to afford, (I mean myself) not to undermind anybody.

some product do works however.

ok so hv u brought this product & try it out?

[Guest VBlaster_W211]

Looks to me like another snake oil product.

You need proper tuning for optimal AR ratio for best power and economy.

[Guest Pattanct]

blackmercs wrote:

ok so hv u brought this product & try it out?

nope, am seeking opinion.

[Guest lightning]

Pattanct wrote:

nope, am seeking opinion.

go to mycarforum and read in detail this thread...hope you can be convinced after that :hand: :Cry:

http://www.mycarforum.com/index.php?showtopic=2290668&hl=nanoball*

[Guest Longshanks]

Best little trick you can do: check your tire pressure and up it by about 10% from the default. Sub-optimal tire pressure is pretty common here.. Almost always, you get a more crisp handling, lesser rolling resistance and yes, slightly better fuel economy. It's good, it's fast n it's free. :bounce:

NewC180 wrote:

Most of the time, you can have either improved power, or improved fuel efficiency, you can't have both. If there's such a product, I'm keen too.

Some wise man told me before:

1. Cheap

2. Good

3. Fast

You can only choose 2 from the above, applies to a lot of things....

Cheers!

[Guest Pattanct]

Longshanks wrote:

Best little trick you can do: check your tire pressure and up it by about 10% from the default. Sub-optimal tire pressure is pretty common here.. Almost always, you get a more crisp handling, lesser rolling resistance and yes, slightly better fuel economy. It's good, it's fast n it's free. :bounce:

talking about car pressure, pls advice me for 17" rim, what is the pressure shld be charge in? sorry, havent fully read the manual.

[Guest kepiting1sg]

Pattanct wrote:

talking about car pressure, pls advice me for 17" rim, what is the pressure shld be charge in? sorry, havent fully read the manual.

Dear Mr. Pat Tan - sorry got to chk your profile cos U didn't mention any where what ride U are driving. So it's difficult to tell U what's the recommended tyre pressure.

Your E200 Avantgarde VRN SGN XXXX probably put U in Oct/Nov 2006.

I believe your ride is the FL W211 E200K unless the VRN has been changed.

Your wheels should be 8J x 17 H2 ET 38 and not 8.5J x 17 H2 ET 38

and U are using 245/45 R17 right!

Your avantgarde rims looks like below?

still cannot help U cos old man got memory loss!

The recommended tyre pressures are stated in your fuel filler flap!

[Guest Pattanct]

kepiting1sg wrote:

Dear Mr. Pat Tan - sorry got to chk your profile cos U didn't mention any where what ride U are driving. So it's difficult to tell U what's the recommended tyre pressure.

Your E200 Avantgarde VRN SGN XXXX probably put U in Oct/Nov 2006.

I believe your ride is the FL W211 E200K unless the VRN has been changed.

Your wheels should be 8J x 17 H2 ET 38 and not 8.5J x 17 H2 ET 38

and U are using 245/45 R17 right!

Your avantgarde rims looks like below?

still cannot help U cos old man got memory loss!

The recommended tyre pressures are stated in your fuel filler flap!

Hi there,

thank you for trying to help, i didnt update my profile, my car is a facelifted model, registered in Feb 2008 (so shld be 8.5J x 17 H2 ET 38??) and the rim is exactly the same in your posted link. car plate is old number.... Yes, is 245/45 R17, i will check on the fuel flap tomor. i think 36psi shld be quite safe. I like it hard :bounce:

[Guest kepiting1sg]

Pattanct wrote:

Hi there,

thank you for trying to help, i didnt update my profile, my car is a facelifted model, registered in Feb 2008 (so shld be 8.5J x 17 H2 ET 38??) and the rim is exactly the same in your posted link. car plate is old number.... Yes, is 245/45 R17, i will check on the fuel flap tomor. i think 36psi shld be quite safe. I like it hard :bounce:

I had previously a late Dec 2007 FL W211 avantgarde too but I cannot remember the TP.

IIRC the front & back pressure is different,

Not full load

Front I think previously I pumped around 32 or 33psi and rear around 38 psi

Higher TP than recommended will have a slightly harder ride!

[Guest lightning]

Hahaha...from nanoball to tyre pressure...:becky:

[Guest kepiting1sg]

lightning wrote:

Hahaha...from nanoball to tyre pressure...:becky:

U wanna my tang yuan or not....muahahaha!

This forum sometimes we allow some tcss lah!:becky:

[Guest lightning]

kepiting1sg wrote:

U wanna my tang yuan or not....muahahaha!

This forum sometimes we allow some tcss lah!:becky:

:whistle: 100% agree... It's only a forum so tcss is part and parcel ...but me and bro blackmerc kenna terkan for being OT :tsk: :shocked:

[keltanky]

once in a while some little tcss ok la, but sometimes dun over do it OTs la...

forums must have some noise and fun too...

[Guest Raskie]

keltanky wrote:

o

forums must have some noise and fun too...

HEAR HEAR HEAR .... *thumbs-up*